The money may move quietly. The human stories behind it shouldn’t.
Someone needs to send money home.
Maybe it’s a worker supporting parents thousands of kilometres away.
Maybe it’s a mother paying school fees.
Maybe it’s a family paying for food, rent, medicine, or an emergency.
They don’t necessarily want anything complicated.
They just want one thing:
“Make sure my family gets the money.”
For generations, informal value-transfer systems such as hawala have helped people move value across borders, particularly in places where formal banking services are expensive, inaccessible, unreliable, or simply unavailable. FATF describes hawala and similar providers as systems that historically emerged to facilitate trade and that remain important in parts of the Middle East, Africa and South Asia.
And that’s important.
Because hawala itself is not synonymous with crime.
That distinction matters.
It Isn’t “Secret Money”
The internet loves dramatic explanations.
“Money disappears.”
“No banks involved.”
“Nobody can trace it.”
Sounds like a crime thriller.
Reality is more complicated.
At a basic level, hawala involves intermediaries—often called hawaladars—who arrange for value to be paid to someone elsewhere, with settlement between the intermediaries taking place through arrangements that may not look like conventional bank-to-bank transfers.
The World Bank has noted that the idea that hawala simply “moves money without moving money” is misleading. The underlying economics can resemble other payment systems; the major difference can be the use of informal rather than formal channels and the way settlement is recorded.
So perhaps the better description isn’t:
“Money without a story.”
It’s:
“A financial story that may not appear in the places investigators normally expect to find it.”
And that’s where things become complicated.
The Same Door Can Serve Two Very Different People
Imagine two people.
The first is a migrant worker.
They earn honestly.
They want to send part of their salary to their family.
They use a legitimate remittance channel available to them.
Nothing sinister.
Nothing dramatic.
Just someone trying to take care of the people they love.
Now imagine someone else.
A criminal network has generated illicit proceeds.
They also want to move value.
They don’t want questions.
They don’t want scrutiny.
They don’t want investigators connecting the money to the crime.
That same type of informal financial channel can become attractive for abuse.
And this is exactly why the distinction matters.
The system isn’t the criminal.
People can misuse systems.
FinCEN has explicitly noted that informal value-transfer systems serve legitimate purposes while also warning that they can be misused for money laundering and other financial crimes.
The Investigator’s Problem
Here’s where the story gets interesting.
Imagine investigators are looking at a trafficking network.
They find the victim.
They identify the recruiter.
They discover the company.
They locate suspicious financial activity.
But then they ask:
Where did the money go?
And suddenly, the trail becomes complicated.
Some value may have moved through formal financial institutions.
Some may have moved through businesses.
Some may have involved cash.
Some may have passed through informal value-transfer networks.
Different countries may have different regulatory frameworks.
Records may vary.
Names and languages may differ.
Businesses may be mixed with legitimate commercial activity.
And financial systems don’t always speak the same language.
FinCEN has described identifying underground or informal money transmitters as a significant regulatory and investigative challenge, while also warning against eliminating legitimate access to financial services for underserved communities.
That’s the balance.
Find the criminals without criminalizing the communities who depend on legitimate financial services.
The Dangerous Mistake: “Hawala = Crime”
This is where public conversations can go badly wrong.
Hawala is used legitimately.
People use informal remittance systems because they can be accessible, trusted, fast, or useful in places where formal financial infrastructure is limited.
FATF’s current work also recognizes that hawala and similar providers can operate under different legal and regulatory frameworks depending on the jurisdiction—including as licensed or registered entities in some places and as unregulated or illegal mechanisms in others.
So the responsible conversation isn’t:
“Ban hawala because criminals use it.”
It’s:
“How do we prevent criminals from abusing financial systems while preserving legitimate financial access?”
That’s a much harder question.
And a much smarter one.
Because Financial Crime Has Human Victims
Money laundering can sound abstract.
AML.
KYC.
SARs.
Beneficial ownership.
Financial intelligence.
Compliance.
Acronyms everywhere.
But behind the financial terminology can be a very human reality.
Consider a trafficking victim.
Someone promised a job.
Someone deceived.
Someone exploited.
Someone whose wages were taken.
Someone whose freedom was controlled.
Now imagine the proceeds generated from that exploitation being moved through a financial network.
Suddenly, it’s not just:
“A suspicious transaction.”
It’s evidence of someone’s suffering.
The financial trail can become a path toward the truth.
FinCEN explains that financial records and suspicious-activity information can provide investigators with trails that help identify criminal activity, assets and previously unknown connections.
That makes financial intelligence powerful.
Not because money matters more than people.
But because money can sometimes tell investigators where the people responsible are hiding.
Follow the Money. But Don’t Forget the Person.
This is where the entire conversation should come back to.
The objective isn’t to build a world where every informal financial transaction looks suspicious.
The objective is to identify genuine risk.
Proportionately.
Intelligently.
Fairly.
That means appropriate AML controls.
Effective customer due diligence where required.
Registration or licensing where applicable.
Suspicious-activity reporting frameworks.
Information sharing.
Financial intelligence.
Cross-border cooperation.
And trained investigators who understand both the financial system and the communities using it.
The goal is not:
“Stop money from moving.”
The goal is:
“Stop criminal money from hiding behind legitimate financial activity.”
And Then There’s the Question Nobody Likes
What happens when the money trail leads somewhere unexpected?
A business.
A property.
A bank account.
An intermediary.
A network of people.
Another country.
Another transaction.
Another name.
Another victim.
That’s when financial investigation becomes more than accounting.
It becomes storytelling.
Except the story isn’t written in paragraphs.
It’s written in transactions.
Dates.
Names.
Companies.
Payments.
Relationships.
Patterns.
And sometimes, those patterns help investigators connect pieces of a crime that otherwise might have remained invisible.
The Human Side of Every Transfer
Think about what legitimate remittances mean.
A father sending money for his child’s education.
A daughter helping her parents pay rent.
A migrant worker supporting siblings.
A family receiving money after a medical emergency.
These aren’t suspicious stories.
They’re stories of responsibility.
Love.
Survival.
Family.
That’s why financial regulation must be careful.
Don’t punish the bridge because criminals sometimes try to cross it.
Strengthen the bridge.
Monitor genuine risks.
Investigate abuse.
Protect legitimate users.
And hold criminals accountable.
The Future Should Be Smarter, Not More Suspicious
Technology is changing finance rapidly.
Digital payments.
Mobile money.
Real-time transfers.
Online financial services.
Cross-border platforms.
Informal systems continue to exist alongside formal ones.
The challenge for governments and financial institutions is therefore not simply to create more restrictions.
It’s to create smarter systems.
Systems that can identify meaningful risk without treating entire communities as suspicious.
Systems that allow legitimate remittances to continue.
Systems that give investigators better financial intelligence.
Systems that make criminal money harder to hide.
Because financial inclusion and financial security shouldn’t have to be enemies.
We need both.
One Last Thought
Somewhere tonight, someone may be sending money home.
They aren’t laundering money.
They aren’t hiding anything.
They’re simply trying to help their family survive.
Somewhere else, a criminal may be trying to move money generated through exploitation.
Same planet.
Different story.
And that’s why the conversation around hawala needs nuance.
Not fear.
Not stereotypes.
Not sensationalism.
Context.
Hawala can serve legitimate human needs.
Criminals can attempt to abuse financial channels.
Investigators have to tell the difference.
Regulators have to build proportionate safeguards.
And society has to remember the people behind the transactions.
Because every suspicious financial trail is ultimately about something more important than money.
Accountability.
Justice.
And the people who deserve protection.
The money may move quietly.
The records may be incomplete.
The network may be complicated.
But the human cost should never disappear behind the numbers.
Don’t criminalize a financial tradition. Criminalize the exploitation hiding behind it.
About the Author
